Paul Tully from SPUC is quoted as saying
The letter contains a number of misleading and false assertions. We refute these. The point is clearly to mislead pelple and damage SPUC and the pro-life movement as a whole.but the article then goes on to quote several of the misleading and false assertions without further comment.
As a long-time supporter of SPUC, I have to say that I consider any money I have donated to their high quality work to be very well spent.
1 comment:
'1967 committee for godly governance' - sounds like a load of gobbledegook to me.
Let me say firstly that SPUC is 100% dedicated to the pro-life movement working hard at all levels to promote the 'culture of life' and gaining many successes.
Secondly it sounds ominous to me that the year '1967' should be included in the name of this organisation(?) - the very same year that The Abortion Act was made law in this country!
Our Lady of Guadaloupe pray for us.
Post a Comment