18. Mr. Gordon Prentice (Pendle) (Lab): What the Commissioners’ policy is on smoking in properties for which they are responsible. [137945]Text from Hansard.
22. Mr. Desmond Swayne (New Forest, West) (Con): What preparations the Church Commissioners have made for the coming into force of the ban on smoking in enclosed public spaces with respect to cathedrals. [137949]
24. Michael Fabricant (Lichfield) (Con): What advice the Commissioners are giving to cathedral deans in England with respect to the enforcement of no smoking laws from 1 July 2007; and if he will make a statement. [137951]
The Second Church Estates Commissioner (Sir Stuart Bell): Smoking in places of worship has never been acceptable. Policies for many other Church properties, from offices through to schools and church halls, vary, although many, including the national Church offices, are already smoke free. By way of a statement, guidance about the new provisions is being discussed with the Department of Health and will be promulgated as widely as possible, including to cathedral deans
Mr. Prentice: But we are only a few weeks away from the smoking ban coming in, so would it not be absolute lunacy to require cathedrals and churches to affix no smoking signs to their doors?
Sir Stuart Bell: I agree with my hon. Friend. His original question had to do with the Commission’s offices, and I can tell him that the national Church institutions have had a no smoking policy in place since 2000. They have updated the policy recently, to comply fully with the Health Act 2006.
Mr. Swayne: I speak with some feeling, as a man whose wedding photograph is marred by the fact that an exit sign on the ancient church door appears between my wife and myself. Will the hon. Gentleman resist the regulations vigorously? It would be ironic indeed if we were to give way on this matter as, when the members of the council of my parish church applied for permission to put up a plaque containing the 10 commandments, they were told to get lost.
Sir Stuart Bell: I certainly agree with the sentiments expressed by the hon. Gentleman. I am glad that his marriage is steadfast, notwithstanding the exit sign. I also agree with the Dean of Southwark that it would not be sensible to place no smoking signs on a beautiful Norman doorway that has been locked closed for 500 years. Discussions on the matters are taking place with the Department of Health, which I believe is taking a reasonable approach to signage.
Michael Fabricant: I was somewhat alarmed to hear the hon. Gentleman say that all smoking was banned, as I presume that incense is not covered. I support the smoking ban in general, and voted for it but, if he is right and we have to have signs, does he agree that they could be Gothic, with twirly whirly bits, or Norman? Signs like that would fit in more appropriately with beautiful cathedrals such as the one in Lichfield.
Sir Stuart Bell: I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman. The House will be pleased to know that the Government’s signage policy will be reviewed in the next three years. In the meantime, I anticipate that we will see Gothic signs, if nothing else.
Simon Hughes (North Southwark and Bermondsey) (LD): The hon. Gentleman has got the idea that there is general outrage among anybody who has an interest in cathedrals. I have the privilege to represent two and I used to sing in another. I hope that he will tell the relevant Ministers that, if it is required, all parties should be absolutely willing to agree a very quick change in the regulations so that things can be absolutely clear before D-day and so that we have no stupid notices on buildings that have not needed them for the last 1,000 years.
Sir Stuart Bell: I agree entirely with the hon. Gentleman. The point that he made about regulations is interesting and I will put it to the Department of Health, but we require local authorities to be sensible in their approach and, as of this moment in time, we have no reason to believe that they will be otherwise.
Sir Patrick Cormack (South Staffordshire) (Con): Have the nincompoops who have insisted upon these signs also asked for them to be put up in crematoriums?
Sir Stuart Bell: If we are moving from churches to crematoriums, the hell fires are getting very close, but I can assure the hon. Gentleman that the lighted cigarette in our churches and cathedrals will not be the beginning of those hell fires.
As a Croydon boy myself, I'm happy to give a Birettat Tip to The Croydonian
Since the Sistine Chapel is also an enclosed public space, perhaps the EU - the real nincompoops from which this daft legislation has originated - will need to insist on an alternative method of announcing a new Pope.
10 comments:
MP's are allowed to say "twirly whirly bits" in Parliament?
What sort of country are you running over there anyway?
Hi,
This whole exchange was funny; really, really funny. Thank you for lifting my spirits.
Brian
Hitler introduce non-smoking legislation - ummmm
hilarityjane is absolutely right!
Parliamentary debate and discussion at Westminster, where all major decisions are made about the running of our Country, often borders on a re-run of the Mad Hatters Teaparty.
This is British politics folks - no wonder we are in such a mess! Who will YOU vote for next time - assuming 'New Labour' doesn't abolish the right to vote!
Since the Sistine Chapel is also an enclosed public space, perhaps the EU - the real nincompoops from which this daft legislation has originated - will need to insist on an alternative method of announcing a new Pope.
Thankfully the Vatican City State is outwith the EU so the Cardinal Camerlingo can tell the likes of Peter Mandelson to shove it....in the nicest possible way, of course.
Maybe this is the answer to our current travails with this awful government. Perhaps the Holy Father could grant us all Vatican passports and dual citizenship that puts Catholic agencies beyond the SORS. Just a thought...
@Hilarityjane
MP's are allowed to say "twirly whirly bits" in Parliament?
I take a rather perverse delight in the fact that our representatives are not so hidebound by jargon that they can still use idiosyncratic pieces of English. God help us when they stop.
Oh wow, UK hansard is even better than Australian hansard! Both beat the pants off American records though.
Thank you very much for this, father. =D
Um, George,
I was kidding.
I was quite happy to see the parliamentarians having a bit of fun at the expense of the anti-smoking zealots. Ridicule is all they deserve.
hilarityjane - Um I was kidding....
You may have been, but should you happen to tune-in to 'British Parliamentary debate' pretty much anytime you will find our politicians behaving like overgrown school boys while discussing legislation on virtually any topic. This is British politics in the 21st Century - simply a joke.
God Bless.
George,
I'm afraid it has ever been so, and is the same no matter where you are. One only expects high intellectual debate if one has never actually read the debates that go on in legislatures around the world. For the last few years, it has been a big part of my work to read Hansard from Canada, Britain and Australia and I'm sorry to say that it is the same everywhere. I comfort myself with the knowledge that the same complaints were made about the quality of speeches in the House of Commons in Samuel Johnson's day.
Politicians have always been a bit on the stumpy side. Sad but true and unavoidable in "democracy." An odd world in which the plebes lead. I'm all for a return to agrarian feudalism, personally.
I would welcome a nice big no-smoking sign OUTSIDE the city centre church where I sometimes worship on the offchance it might discourage the indigenous beggars from smoking in the porch during service times (they have to leave the comfortable pew on which they've been sleeping or eating their Big Macs on account of the disturbance created by Mass)and stinking the church out with their roll-ups
PS why are all traditionalists/conservatives apparently so keen on perpetuating the misery of passive smoking?
Post a Comment