Pages

Saturday, 10 November 2007

"Summa Theoblogica"?

Hilary White was in town today, that author of The Devout Life and, more recently, Orwell's picnic. She also writes regularly for the excellent LifeSite News. She was able to get out to visit Blackfen for our Classical Rite Mass this morning so I suggested that we have a bloggers' lunch, accompanied by Mac of Mulier Fortis (to whom credit for the photo.) Pizza and Pasta at Zizzis was not favoured so we opted for the buffet at the Laughing Buddha. As it was lunchtime, we were not favoured either with a customer Karaoke session or with the proprietor doing his star turn as the Chinese Elvis impersonator. But it's an ill wind... the absence of entertainments meant that we could talk.

We inevitably got onto the question of the remarks of Bishop Hollis on the legalisation of brothels. Discussing the views of St Thomas Aquinas, I found myself saying that St Thomas "posted" on the subject. After protesting that I did know that in those days, people wrote things down in other ways, it struck us that the structure of the Summa is not so very different from a blog - admittedly a very well-ordered one. The objections and replies form a sort of medieval combox discussion. I suppose the Commentary on the Sentences could be thought of as a kind of fisk, too. [That's enough silly medieval comparisons. Ed.]

11 comments:

Mac McLernon said...

Summa Theoblogica??? *groans loudly*
Father, I thought better of you than that!

Moretben said...

Nice picture, Father. Dear Hilary - God bless and prosper her.

Dr. Peter H. Wright said...

I'm looking forward to an argumentum and reductio ad absurdum in the combox.

Provided no one mentions the 24 theses..

Anonymous said...

I bet a blog called Summa Theoblogica appears within days.

GOR said...

Good one, Father! I hadn’t thought of the Summa that way, but you have a point – especially about it being “well-ordered”. There are no interminable back-and-forths with the Summa ‘comments’. The questions only admit of a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer - nothing in between - and very few gray areas.

Today, people talk a lot about ’closure’… St. Thomas brings closure swiftly: “But, I say…”

A sort of: “Thomas locutus est. Causa finita est.” Comments closed.

Mrs Jackie Parkes MJ said...

Are you still in that pub Fr? lol

Anonymous said...

Looks as though a fellow blogger has had the same idea. Great minds think alike!

http://blog.talkingphilosophy.com/?p=131

Hiarity said...

Ben, how very nice you are!

Yes, it was great heaping gobs of fun, and one of those very rare occasions when I was able to eat as much Chinese roast duck as I could hold at one sitting.

Moretben said...

What is it with you and ducks?

And don't think for an instant I'm going to let you away with that "nice". ;0)

Ches said...

You have to go a long way these days to find anyone comfortable with the Summa's way of doing things. On that tack, there's a beautiful moment worth recalling from Flannery O'Connor's letters. She used to read the Summa every night before going to sleep, and if her mother came into the room to tell her it was time to turn off the light, O'Connor, with beatific smile, would raise her finger and say, 'On the contrary, the light, being eternal, cannot be switched off. Shut your eyes!'

berenike exlaodicea.wordpress.com said...

You'll have seen the Prosblogion, of course...

http://prosblogion.ektopos.com/

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...