The Government has just accepted all the recommendations of last year's Annual Report of the Teenage Pregnancy Independent Advisory Group (TPIAG). I suppose it is not too surprising that the Government accepts the report since it is actually produced by the Government's Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) on behalf of the TPIAG and is hosted at the Government's "Every Child Matters" website.First of all, let me give you a general flavour of the report. The TPIAG is predictably delighted that the Government has earmarked £26.8 million of our money to for "contraceptive services". They want condoms to be promoted on TV before the 9pm watershed and because of concerns about pornography, they want an official government portal on the internet where young people can access "approved sites on sex and relationships." How reassuring is that for all you mums and dads out there?
The report gives a whistlestop tour of current Government Agency jargon and euphemism. We know about the "Every Child Matters Agenda" - the TPIAG has a few more for us: contraception and sexual health services should meet the Department of Health's "You're Welcome" standards; the SRE pupil audit tool should be part of the Healthy Schools Programme; the Children’s Workforce Network should develop a multi-agency work-based learning package on sex and relationships; a national programme should be "rolled out" so that parents can benefit from the Family Planning Association's "Speakeasy" programme. Well Being is obviously a new euphemism that is rising in popularity: SRE must be "embedded" into the "statutory entitlement of the promotion of well-being", and included in the Government’s Well-Being Indicators - just to make sure, there should be a specialist PSHE teacher in every school to deliver the Well-Being duty.
More on that "Speakeasy" programme in a minute, but first a couple of points that link in neatly to the Government's latest proposals for sex-education which I mentioned a few days ago. There was some confusion because the CES said that Governing bodies retain the right to determine what is taught, in line with the ethos of the school. On the other hand, Mr Balls, the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (the title indicates something of a wider claim than "Minister of Education") said that faith schools would not be allowed to refuse to teach about contraception. The confusion now seems to be cleared up by the Government's acceptance of the TPIAG recommendation that it should:State clearly that all schools including faith schools must teach all aspects of SRE within the context of relationships in an anti-discriminatory way; contraception, abortion and homosexuality are all legal in this country and therefore all children and young people should be able to learn the correct facts.Ah yes, the "correct facts". Not those nasty politically incorrect facts that Catholic bloggers insist on repeating with their pedantic references to peer-reviewed studies. I am reminded of Thomas Gradgrind at the beginning of Charles Dickens' "Hard Times" (surely one of the best opening paragraphs of a novel):
'NOW, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!'The Government has also accepted the recommendation that it should,
Make explicit links to young people's advisory services and provision of contraception and sexual health services and demonstrate this by teaching young people how to access services"Perhaps the most jaw-dropping comment is in the section where the TPIAG wants to get all the materials to parents because
Many parents and carers lack awareness about sex and relationships issues ...Well, after all, they've only had children and nurtured them: they don't have specialist training in delivering the "Well Being Duty".
You can get an idea of the sort of education promoted by the TPIAG from the resource that they recommend for parents from the Family Planning Association: "Speakeasy". On page 19 of the parents' book, we have this quote from "Mother of two daughters, aged 11 and nine":
I was brought up in the Roman Catholic faith and have always believed that life started at the point of conception. I think it’s a real tragedy that there are so many abortions although I know that sometimes it’s the only realistic choice a woman or girl has. I’m still not quite sure what I think about this – but doing the Speakeasy course gave me the confidence to present information about contraception to my children and when it comes to it – it will be their choice what they decide to do.A sneaky undermining of Catholic teaching on the consistent pro-life ethic there.
Even more disturbing is the advice given to parents if they find a condom in their 15 year old child's bedroom. There's some stuff about not jumping to conclusions, being available to talk etc. Then:
If your son or daughter is having sex, you should acknowledge their responsible behaviour in using condoms. This is also a good opportunity to find out if they know how to use a condom and fill in any gaps in their knowledge. It is important that they protect themselves from unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections so you need to make sure they know how to use condoms effectively. Tell them they can get confidential advice about contraception and sexually transmitted infections from young people’s services. [Brook, Sexwise, FPA...]Now I thought that the age of consent was 16. If a 15 year old is sexually active, does it not occur to the TPIAG that their "partner" might be some years older? The Child Safeguarding courses that I have attended emphasise the duty to call the Police if you have a reasonable suspicion that a child is in danger of being the victim of a criminal offence . Parents whose confidence is already undermined by the professionalisation of child care and the arrogation of many of their rights by the State are now to be intimidated into colluding with underage sexual activity, patting their child on the head for using a condom, sending them off to outside agencies, and generally abdicating their responsibility for their own child's safety. But don't despair! They can tick a box on the "Well Being Indicator" chart.
(H/T John Smeaton: Government's teen pregnancy strategy undermines parents and betrays children
9 comments:
The Substantive Protocols to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms:
1. Protocol No.1, 20 March 1952
Article (2):
No person shall be denied the right to education. In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teaching, the State shall respect the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.
Nothing could be clearer. The government has no right to usurp the role of parents or to impose itself and its (let’s have) sex education policy between parents and the school/Church authorities to whom they legitimately delegate their parental responsibilities in regards to the moral and social development and education of their children.
Excellent though alarming post.
But if one were to teach children about contraception, etc., wouldn't that be facilitating a moral evil, and isn't that a grave sin?? So once again, thanks to this government's legislation, we are likely to be pincered between committing a criminal offence and a moral one. Is that the kind of society all those men gave their lives for in the wars?
I am really grateful to you, Father, for posting this. All this Mordor stuff percolates to Scandinavia. This way I am forewarned of the latest trends and able to take on our local school in an informed way.
Fire: meet petrol.
No wonder they want to "monitor" homeschoolers...
Having read through the sample pages of the parents' "Speakeasy" book I find it unbelievably pernicious and "values free" in the worst possible sense. There's no differentiation between talking with a child about puberty and graphic discussion of sexual activity (in a values-free vacuum, natch!)... the implication is that if you don't do the latter, you're a prude who won't discuss the former either, and your child will stumble into adolescence thinking that babies appear under cabbage leaves and believe they're hemorrhaging to death when their periods appear. What tosh!
Also note --
"If you are bringing your
child up within a
particular faith they
still need clear
information about sex and
relationships, and you
can give them this in the
context of your faith. Your
child needs to know
about puberty and the
changes that will happen
as they grow up. As a
responsible parent you
can help your children
find out all the good things
about their sexuality and
how to stay safe."
...now, one could interpret this as approval for a Catholic parent to discuss the virtue of chastity, the beauty of the marriage act - within marriage, and God's intention for those called to marriage, as well as those called to celibacy. That would pretty much cover "all the good things about their sexuality and how to stay safe" but I suspect that my interpretation would horrify the writers of this book.
...and on the subject of divorcing sex from procreation: page 61 tells parents how to answer a daughter's query about whether boys prefer girls with large breasts. Nowhere -- absolutely nowhere -- is the purpose of breasts mentioned. The answer is almost surreal in its avoidance of the simple truth that breasts are for babies.
In the same week that I read a review of the Hollywood adaptation of Roald Dahl's Fantastic Mr Fox where Mr Fox's son turns out to be misunderstood because he's ... gay, this is just another surreal twist in the how-many-ways-can-"they"-try-to-corrupt-our-children story...
Disturbing, to say lthe least...
If you thought Fr Finigan’s post was depressing, now for something worse. Fr Finigan posts about ‘proposed’ action by the secular Labour government. The fact is that almost all of this is taking place already in Catholic schools, and taking place without any pressure other than the fear of being ‘the odd one out’. How, you might ask?
The ‘Healthy School’s Programme’, that’s how. By sending a teacher on this course, and most head-teachers will pick someone that is enthusiastic about teaching ‘sexual health’ (i.e. a secularist or lapsed Catholic), someone who wont create waves and will pass the course, the school can put the logo, ‘Healthy School’s’ on its letter-head, website, what have you.
That’s how and why it happened at the secondary school at which I taught in East Anglia. I, for some reason, although I went to the ‘Open Day’ for the ‘Healthy Schools Programme' was not able to attend further sessions as a result of insufficient funding. Curiously, this happened after I raised questions about the presence of the ‘Terence Higgins Trust’ as one of the providers of tutors.
To sell your soul for the ‘Chamberlain of Wales’ (ok, I’m sure I misquoted St Thomas More in ‘Man for All Seasons’) is pathetic. But to sell your soul, and those you are responsible for as a head teacher for a logo, beggars belief.
Let me guess, they are also teaching them how to sterilize needles so in case they make "the choice" to shoot up later in life they'll have the confidence they are doing it right, so they'll be less likely to get AIDS, right?
thought not.
The same thing is happening in the public schools of the US. Unfortunately it is all too often the parents who have abrogated their rsponsibilities to the state and the state just runns with the ball.
Speaking of which Mr Balls is aptly named. Take note: this is an example of tyrany.
Brantgny
Post a Comment