As Sandro Magister has commented in his Italian language blog Settimo Caelo, the question of the primacy of the will in Scotist theology raises the question which the Holy Father himself brought up with regard to Islam in his Regensburg lecture. An absolute and innate freedom opens up the possibility of a God who is not tied to the true and the good. However, Pope Benedict points out that the desire to preserve an absolute transcendence of the impenetrable will of God does not take account of the fact that God is revealed in Christ as "Logos". The Holy Father continued (my translation):
Certainly, as Duns Scotus affirmed within the line of Franciscan theology, love exceeds knowledge and is capable of perceiving more than thought, but it is always the love of God "logos". Even in man, the idea of absolute liberty, located in the will, forgetting its link with the truth, ignores the fact that the same liberty must be liberated from the restrictions that come from sin.I expect that an English translation of the address will be online soon (and perhaps an English translation of Sandro Magister's article - look out on his blog Chiesa.) In the meantime, here is a link to a summary from Vatican radio.

2 comments:
I'm no theologian, still less a philosopher, but do I understand the issue to be about either(a) God wills only what is good, or (b) whatever He wills is good, because He wills it?
So, is the difference between an intrinsically moral Deity and an arbitrary and capricious being?
Yes, I think your a) and b) sum it up quite well - but neither leads to an arbitrary and capricious being. Furthermore, in God, being, oneness, good, true are all "convertible" since God is the ultimately simple.
The relevance of the discussion is particularly in God's relation to His creation.
Post a Comment