Hard work and glorious liturgy
I arrived at Oxford for the second half of Alcuin Reid's lecture on Tuesday, in which he expounded on the organic development of the Liturgy and the importance of Summorum Pontificum. I am sure he will publish the text in due course. He allowed himself one irresistible punchline by quoting the Tablet article which said that Pope Benedict was "not a trained liturgist". The ribald mirth generated by quoting this judgement confirmed that it has now firmly achieved legendary status.
From the lecture, we went to the College Chapel for solemn Vespers. Thanks to this conference and last year's CIEL conference I am a little more familiar with solemn vespers now and I would love to try to introduce it in the parish. It would provide an opportunity for people to experience the Roman liturgical tradition outside of the context of Mass.
After supper, I went to bed fairly smartly since my private Mass at the Oratory in the morning was scheduled for 6.15am. I was in the House Chapel. After making my thanksgiving the the Church, I took this photo of one of the several other Masses being said:
Wednesday was the main teaching day with four sessions going through the ceremonies of Low Mass with different groups of priests. My group was for "beginners". In his introduction, Fr Andrew Wadsworth answered the implied criticism of the Conference in the assertion of one Bishop, that a priest cannot learn to say Mass according to the usus antiquior in a two day conference. Nobody actually imagined that they could. But a two day conference is a good start and it gave priests the confidence and the resources to continue learning until they feel able to say the Mass privately with the assistance of an experienced server and perhaps also an Assistant Priest for their "first Mass" in the older form.
In all the groups, the practical teaching was mingled with some discussion of various pastoral points relating to the introduction of traditional liturgy in the "normal" parish, for example, the need for care, sensitivity and charity that was often lacking when the newer form of the rite was introduced in the 1970s.
After the two morning sessions, the clergy attended in Choir at the High Mass celebrated by Fr Anthony Conlon, the Chaplain to the Latin Mass Society, assisted by Dr Lawrence Hemming as Deacon and Fr John Emerson as Subdeacon:
The magnificent vestments were loaned from France and (I think) were those used at the Chartres Pilgrimage Mass.
On the Wednesday evening, I was the second Assistant Priest for Pontifical Vespers at which Bishop Rifan presided. This was followed by a banquet provided at the expense of the Latin Mass Society which had heavily subsidised the Conference for priests. We were treated to an excellent meal, courtesy of the Merton College staff, rounded off by enjoyable speeches from Julian Chadwick, the Chairman of the LMS, and Fr Jerome Bertram of the Oxford Oratory.
Fr Bertram gave a witty and entertaining analysis of the phrase "Ite Missa Est". He pointed out that in many languages, the idea of "Go in peace" is introduced with no foundation in the original, obscure as it may be. He suggested that on the contrary, the Mass itself was the occasion of peace and that once finished, we went out to engage in the spiritual battle of the apostolate.
Although my Mass this morning was scheduled for the later time of 6.45am, the mitigated penance of rising not quite so early was spiced up a little by the fire alarm going off at about 1.30am. After my own Mass, I served Mass for another priest who welcomed a little discreet guidance here and there.
After breakfast, there was a discussion session followed by a public lecture by Dr Lawrence Hemming. He rightly chose to move away from the more particular rubrical matters that had formed an important part of the conference and gave a brilliant exposition of the nature of liturgy itself. The lecture was not a formal paper but Dr Hemming has a book out soon which will cover in detail many of the points that he discussed.
The conference ended with the celebration of Pontifical High Mass celebrated by Bishop Slattery of the Diocese of Tulsa, Oklahoma, who was present with his chaplain for the whole conference. His engaging and gentle sermon compared the recent foundation of his diocese with the antiquity of Merton College, and compared that with the antiquity of the Roman Rite, speaking of the "tyranny of relative time."
(photo credit: Schola Sainte Cécile)Have a look at the other photos at the Schola Sainte Cécile. The gold vestments and the magnificent mitre were loaned by Richard Luzar from his private collection. Just think: someone actually wanted to get rid of these things from their Church or Cathedral!
The Conference was a great success, especially in the confidence that it gave to the priests who came: not only in the particular matter of learning to celebrate Mass in the usus antiquior but also more generally for all of us, in our priestly identity. There was a genuine sense of "gaudium et spes" and a determination to continue with more events in the future.
(More tomorrow.)


11 comments:
Father, Recently I attended Mass in the extraordinary form and was very struck by one aspect of it. Since I attended parochial school for seven years in the fifies and therefore daily Mass as well, I should be utterly familiar with it, at least in its outward form, but I have to say I NEVER recall seeing the server kiss the hand of the priest at any point. This recent celebration was replete with this gesture and frankly it was disturbing. I think that every time the priest handed the server anything, for example a cruet, the server lightly kissed the priest's hand. In this latter case he kissed the cruet,too. To me it seemed utterly bizarre, to say nothing of abjectly servile. There were at least ten incidents of this kind.
Nevertheless, I wonder if the rubrics call for such a gesture. It occurs to me that perhaps the American bishops had gotten some sort of a dispensation to adapt the liturgy to American sensibilities and that those implementing the liturgy now have decided to re-instate it. Do you know?
Where would I find a definitive answer in print?
The reason I ask is that the priest was of the order that is going to be advising EWTN on how to celebrate the extraordinary form. It seems to me, at any rate, that celebrating Mass in that fashion is likely to be very offensive to many people.
Perhaps it's just me, but I doubt it.
Looks amazing!
I'm delighted it went so well, Fr Tim. Having looked at the photos on your blog and on others, I was delighted to see that the contingent from my diocese (Portsmouth) comprised in two of the three most recently ordained priests, both priests in their first 18 months of priesthood.
I was in Portland, Maine last Sunday and we went to Mass at the Cathedral. The 12noon Mass was a Low Mass in the forma extraordinaria and was attended by about 130 - about 50% of whom were young families, 25% people on their own between 20 and 50 and the balance golden oldies.
The Bishop is the Pastor of the parish and stood at the door to see people out at the end of the Mass. I had a brief chat with him and he was really quite encouraging. He said he couldn't understand what all the fuss many of his brother bishops were making was about with the MP. His own experience was that the 12noon congregation contained many of his most committed and engaged parishioners and that the indult Mass was a vital part of the life of his parish. Really most refreshing.
I am filled with such hope and joy!
Oh, it sounds absolutely wonderful, Father. I am just now reading Alcuin Reid's Organic Development of the Liturgy, so would be interested to read his lecture if published.
Do keep us posted,
Mark
Lee - they are the solita oscula. Each time you hand something to the priest, you kiss the thing, then his hand. when you take something from him, you kiss his hand then the thing.
The gesture is more common at High Mass or at Mass with a Bishop. I'm not sure how common it is at a simple low Mass said by a priest. My experience is that in such a case, the solita oscula are normally omitted.
I expect some more rubrically expert readers may be able to shed more light on this.
The solita oscula are included in the Rubrics for High Mass, but are supposed to be done by clerics (for obvious reasons, since the deacon or subdeacon will only do it, though a lay subdeacon can do it too). The rubrics do not say anything about it concerning Low Mass, so it is not disallowed per se.
Just to add, this is also common in the Eastern church too, where the servers and the deacon do kiss the celebrants hand at these times and also after the celebrant has just censed the congregation at the offertory.
Cheers,
Yaqoob
Like Lee, I have no recollection (at this distance) of the solita oscula. However, it seems to me a "beautiful thing" (cf. Mk 14:6). In the words of institution, we read of Our Lord taking the bread in his "holy and venerable hands" (sanctas ac venerabiles manus suas). Venerating the hands of the priest in this way reminds us that the priest stands in persona Christi and that in reverencing the consecrated hands of the priest, we adore the wounded hands of the risen Christ.
It is precisely because the usus antiquior is rich in such edifying symbolism - absent (so far as I know) from the newer use - that it is beneficial to reacquaint ourselves with it and learn once more what was once the patrimony of all.
It's usually put that in the UK and US it's customary for the kisses to be ommitted by lay servers.
As for kissing in general there's also the kissing of the bishops ring (including IIRC after recieving communion).
In some cultures, the priests hands are more generally kissed as a greeting among Roman Catholics.
Among the Russian Orthodox in Communion with Rome here in New York the priests hand is kissed by the faithful after recieving an individual blessing at the end of the divine liturgy (and the foot of the chalice my be kissed immediately after taking communion, not to mention that icons are saluted with a kiss when entering the church).
In answer to Lee: I have a booklet called 'How to Serve Low Mass' published by Benzinger Brothers, which was printed in the USA with a copyright of 1931. The Imprimatur is from the Cardinal Archbishop of New York, Patrick Cardinal Hayes. On page 28 it says the following: "As soon as the priest comes towards you, you make a slight bow and present the cruets to him, kissing each cruet before presenting it and also after you receive it back from him...”
Although, I don't have any documentary evidence, I have also seen the following (I saw it done today actually) and I've done it myself (depending on the priest): upon arriving at the Sanctuary, when taking the biretta, the server first kisses the priest's hand and then the biretta; the opposite is done before leaving the sanctuary: the server kisses the biretta and then the priest's hand.
Well, whaddaya know! I’ve just found this blog entry by Fr. Z on the very subject! :c).
Also, I don't think that the act is anything to do with subservience, it's more a sign of respect, firstly for the Priestly Character and secondly for the liturgical object. As Sahir mentions, it is also done in the Eastern Rites; and isn’t there the custom in several countries, of kissing the priest's hand as a greeting, at least among elderly people?
It was always the custom in Britain for lay servers to omit the solita oscula. Fortescue briefly discusses this in the Ceremonies of the Roman Rite.
Post a Comment