BBC bias article

Fiorella has reminded me that she did some extensive work analysing the BBC programme Sex in the Holy City which I mentioned in the post Can We Trust the BBC - 1.

Her article is in pdf format and is downloadable from this page at the SPUC website. It looks particularly at:
  • Allegations made, particularly the use of unreferenced figures and case studies
  • The use of slanted language and interview tactics
  • The omission of information
  • The use of negative stereotypes
It is incontrovertibly demonstrated that in this programme the BBC breached its own guidelines.

The BBC's response to an initial complaint was:
The BBC programme complaints unit concluded its response to SPUC by finding that “the programme supported its claims with properly researched and journalistically sound examples” and could “find no grounds for upholding your complaint against this programme.”
There is a good example to illustrate Robin Aitken's claim that the BBC knows it can slough off complaints because it is difficult to give evidence of bias and they know that normally no hard evidence will be forthcoming.

But what happens when there is hard evidence in the form of a 30 page dossier investigating a programme? What was the BBC's response to Fiorella's evidence?

Errr. No response.

Popular posts from this blog

Three Things that are Wrong about Making Everyone Stand after Holy Communion

Must we call it the Sacrament of Reconciliation rather than the Sacrament of Confession?

5 Things about Votive Masses to bring up under AOB at the Parish Council Meeting

Congratulations to Bishop Hying, the diocese of Madison, and Fr Z

Saint Stanislaus, two sad comparisons, and the fall of Communism