Ecclesia Dei reshuffle
Today, Pope Benedict has issued a Motu Proprio Ecclesiae unitatem, restructuring the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei.
In this Motu Proprio, the Holy Father observes that although he has freed up the use of the older form of the Roman rite and remitted the excommunications of the four Bishops ordained by Archbishop Lefevbre,
The doctrinal questions, however, obviously remain, and, until they are not clarified, the Fraternity does not have a canonical status within the Church, and its ministers cannot exercise any ministry legitimately.Therefore, since the remaining questions are doctrinal, he has placed Ecclesia Dei under the Congregration for the Doctrine of the Faith, something he indicated his intention to do when the excommunications were lifted. The President of Ecclesia Dei is now the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of hte Faith, Cardinal Levada and a new secretary has been appointed, Mgr Guido Pozzi.
Fr Z has some comment on the restructuring, pointing out that this is the next logical step. John Allen sees it as payback time: Pope removes officials seen as responsible for Holocaust-denying bishop row. I'm not sure about that - certainly Cardinal Hoyos is due for his well-earned retirement and the appointment of Pozzi is a recognition of the doctrinal priority that now remains. (By the way, note, as Fr Z points out, that Mgr Perl is from Luxembourg - not Belguim or Italy.)
Cathcon reports that the German press is portraying the changes as the Pope putting more pressure on the SSPX. In Germany, headlines are now appearing such as "Pope loses patience" and "Pope strengthens control over SSPX".
Fr Z suspects that the liturgical questions continuing to arise after Summorum Pontificum may be gently pushed in the way of the Congregation for Divine Worship. Given that the Holy Father is evidently keen to foster unity with the SSPX, I think it is unlikely that there will be any drawing back on the liturgical question.
For the doctrinal matters, Pope Benedict has repeatedly insisted on the need to interpret Vatican II in accord with the tradition of the Church, thus making the path as smooth as possible for discussions with the SSPX as well as providing a much-needed antidote to the false dichotomy between the "pre-conciliar Church" and the "post-conciliar Church" which has dogged theological discussion so much over recent decades.
This video produced by the SSPX provides some light relief:
Notes:
The SSPX is known in German as the Piusbruderschaft
Unverwechselbar = "unmistakeable"
H/T Catholic Church Conservation



9 comments:
The SSPX is treating the pope like a scorned secondary school boyfriend. Some day the boy will decide another girl is more worthy of his attention, and maybe the girl with the stuck up nose is really conceited, as all his friends have been telling him.
And here was I thinking that a Brüderschaft was a formal drink taken to cement advancing to an informal (brotherly) form of address (i.e. vous to tu) ...
To find that it can also mean an ecclesiastical community seems a bit, well, odd - but then I took Greek instead of German at school.
gemoftheocean:
No, it's not about boyfriends or girlfriends or stuck up noses. It's rather more important.
On the liturgical level we have seen the reinstatement of the traditional Roman rite. On the disciplinary level we have seen the removal of the excommunications. On the doctrinal level, we are shortly to see the kickoff of the most important debate on Vatican II since 1965.
The outcome of this debate concerns us all, because it may well involve a magisterial interpretation of some of the unclear texts of the Council and a clarification of the status of its various constitutions, decrees and declarations.
There is nothing personal involved. The leadership of the SSPX have always remarked on how well they get along with His Holiness and Cardinal Castrillon. They are not doing all this for themselves; it's for the whole church.
Let's pray for the Holy Father's intentions.
When Summorum Pontificum was published precisely two years ago, many who opposed it said that the Pope was just trying to appease the SSPX.
Those who defended the Motu Proprio argued that in fact it stemmed from the Holy Father's concern about the modern liturgical crisis, the interuption of a hermeneutic of continuity and a desire that the EF should be given the opportunity to take it's rightful place at the Altars of Christendom.
Today it seems as if the Holy Father's motive was, in fact, what the opponents of SP said it was.
I find that a little disappointing.
David - various commentators have tried to portray the reshuffle in a negative light. However the Holy Father's motives are made quite clear by him in the letter accompanying SP. My reading of the present situation is that his desire for liturgical reform hasn't changed at all - it is now simply taken for granted. What he does want to push forward is the reconciliation of the SSPX. I think he is going to succeed in that. Although there will, of course, be splinter groups etc. key figures in the SSPX seem quite open to the whole process. And they will then add weight to the recovery of tradition in both doctrine and liturgy.
The reference to Stuttgart (sorry, I'm at work at the moment, so no sound) suggests that this relates to the row about the SSPX's protests against blasphemous performances during the local Gay Pride march.
It's mentioned in a German article on "Gay as a confession of religious faith" at
http://tinyurl.com/nksyct
which I don't unfortunately have time to translate. Those of you who read German can do a word search on Pius or Stuttgart. The whole article is very good as a view from a non-Christian standpoint and highly critical of the gay movement's assumption of victimhood and consequent sanctity.
Many thank, Andrew - most interesting.
FR Tim,i see your Gloria.tv link/embedd did not work, when embedding Gloria.tv video, you will get sometimes after you hit 'Publish',
"ERROR
Your HTML cannot be accepted: Tag is not closed: embedsrc="http://www.gloria..etc etc",
well just tick the "Stop showing HTML errors for the body of this post" box, and hit Publish again.,
in case you didnt know..
PAX
The Gloria TV embed always throws up an error and I corrected it as usual. ATM it seems to be playing fine in Chrome amd Firefox.
(Can someone tell Gloria.tv that the "embed" tag needs to be closed properly?)
Post a Comment