From the Judean Times, 29 August 0031THE DISAPPEARANCE of a controversial preacher styled “John the Baptist”, the leader of a fringe religious group, has become the focus of a scandal that could threaten the government of King Herod.
The “Baptist” has previously been censured by the Health and Safety Inspectorate for failing to undertake a risk assessment before immersing people in the cold water of the Jordan river as part of an exotic religious ritual. The Judean Social Services' Jordan Bank Area Committee have begun an investigation into the emotional abuse of his congregation on the grounds of his insistence on sin and guilt and his use of an overly didactic approach to adult learning in which he instructs people to “Behold” another religious figure as the “Lamb of God” rather than explore different possible lambs of God in small groups according to the personalised learning styles of his hearers. The Judean Health Education Council has issued a statement warning that his “locust and honey” diet is lacking in essential vitamins. They have urged people to focus instead on the avoidance of saturated fats and salt and the consumption of five portions of fruit and vegetables per day.
In the past few days, however, his dogmatic assertions have caused more serious questions to be asked at senior government level. “The Baptist” is reported to have told King Herod that his marriage to Herodias, his brother’s wife, was immoral. An aide to King Herod, Rupert Brownose, a leading member of the Judean Secularist Society commented that his remarks lacked Christian charity. “He is supposed to be a follower of Christ who, I understand, told us to love one another. It hardly seems loving to criticise a public figure for his choice of partner. John the Baptist is exhibiting arrogance and religious intolerance” the spokesman continued, “by presuming to pronounce on the individual conscience of the King.”
Unconfirmed reports suggest that “The Baptist” has recently expressed strong views on a recent event featuring the performance artist Salome, the daughter of the King’s partner by a previous relationship. The itinerant prophet referred to the cultural event as immodest and scandalous. Some of those attending the performance expressed outrage at his comments. Sir Herbert Syncretist-Rolltrouser said, “This so-called prophet's gratuitous insult to a sensitive piece of performance art is the mark of a philistine who has nothing better to do than attempt to impose his personal morality on others.” (Following complaints from Philistine community leaders, Rolltrouser later apologised, saying that his remarks had not been intended to offend any particular ethnic group.)
Since the Salome performance, the “Baptist” has not been seen. Some supporters have claimed that a headless corpse found in the basement of Herod’s Palace is that of their religious leader. They say that the King, besotted with Salome, offered her anything she chose; and that his partner had suggested that she ask for his head on a platter. Government sources have issued a strong denial, insisting that the Queen’s remark was made in jest and that no further action had been taken against the “Baptist.”
13 comments:
In a statement, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Judaea has dismissed claims from Temple officials that religious authorities were not involved.
"The High Priest will be saying next that prophets are honoured in their own country" a spokesman said.
I wonder what light the Rt Revd Dr Spaceley-Trellis, Anglican Bishop of Nerdley can shed on this?
Heheh. Keep these going, Father. :)
Brill! Is that your composition, Father? Worthy of Private Eye!
Anon - thank you for your kind appreciation. (I probably read Private Eye too much.)
Yes, it's mine, all mine! Copyright Tim Finigan 2007. All rights reserved. Tim Finigan asserts the right to be identified as the author of this work. No copying by any means, electronic, pencil and paper or potato printing is allowed.
Oh OK then - anyone can put it on their blog if they are at least mildly amused by it.
Eleven out of ten!
Far too close to the bone Father - very witty and insightful. Unfortunately the clowns that put out this kind of nonsense with a straight face are now the ones with the power. They lack education, perspective, intelligence and decency. And they are unfortunately aided by a noisy minority within the Church. Keep running the race to the end.
Ottimo, Padre T! :)
(Truly a worthy successor to the Vicar of Albion column in the Eye!)
Fr Tim, I know this is a slightly odd query, but please could we have more posts in a sans serif font like this one? I find them much easier to read and they look a lot better on systems that don't use anti-aliasing. It would also produce a more uniform appearance to your blog since the combox posts are in sans serif. Thanks!
Edmund thank you very much for your comment - design questions are always of interest to me.
AIUI, standard typesetting practice, based on research into perception, is to have serif fonts for blocks of text because the eye is led more easily from one letter to the next and therefore the block is easier to read. But this was related to print in books and there may be different findings for people reading things on screen. And I take the point about anti-aliasing.
The font currently used is Georgia which is designed for screen reading rather than print. Were I to move to a sans-serif font, I'd want to one that was designed for the screen - looking at a comparison utility, I think Verdana would be the best.
I wonder though, if this is a problem that affects linux users particularly. Currently 1% of my readers use this so I would not change if the change itself affected the majority of readers adversely.
Rather than theorise about this, though, I think I can feel a poll coming on!
PS - just looked around and apparently there have indeed been studies that show people do find sans-serif fonts easier to read on the screen.
(I must remember that I studied psychology 30 years ago!)
Fr Tim
Thanks for dignifying my rather obscure query with a response; I'll continue the correspondence in the combox if I may.
The situation with fonts in Linux is rather complicated. A Linux system can be configured with proprietary web fonts but the system may not hint them properly due to licensing restrictions on the hinting software.
Anti-aliasing is turned on by default on most Windows and Linux systems but it is useful for some things to switch it off, especially when working with high resolution TFT screens.
Ideally one would choose a properly free font such as one from the Bitstream or Liberation packages (see link above). If blogger.com have implemented their font-family tags correctly, Windows systems should automatically substitute in a proprietary equivalent that will be hinted (and antialiased) according to local settings. Your 1% of Linux users will then be able to enjoy properly hinted fonts, and you'll be able to feel smug about supporting FOSS (in re. Catholic social teaching etc etc etc).
However, this may not be practical and if one needs to use proprietary fonts, then sans serif ones are more tolerant of poor hinting or lack of anti-aliasing. I use Verdana for all my seminars and find it displays consistently across a wide range of platforms and display hardware. It is not included by default on most Linux systems but is available via the commonly installed msttcorefonts package.
Many thanks for the information. That link was interesting. I think that for the moment, I'll probably go to the Verdana font - but we'll have to have the poll first. Some readers of my readers are against all change :-)
Post a Comment